🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.